MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phase I dose escalation study of immunoconjugate L-DOS47 in combination with pemetrexed/carboplatin in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

2020· article· en· W3029263776 on OpenAlexaff
Afshin Dowlati, Chandra P. Belani, George R. Simon, Heman Chao, Sarina A. Piha‐Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsHelix Biopharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPemetrexedCarboplatinMedicineLung cancerInternal medicineGemcitabineOncologyCancerPharmacologyChemotherapyCisplatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e21680 Background: L-DOS47, a cancer therapeutic designed to exploit the acidic tumour extracellular environment, consists of urease conjugated to an anti-CEACAM6 camelid monoclonal antibody. The antibody serves as a targeting agent to deliver urease to tumor sites, while the urease enzyme converts urea, an abundant natural metabolite, into ammonia and generates a local pH increase. The combined effect of ammonia toxicity and pH increase is cytotoxic to cancer cells. An additive cytotoxic effect of L-DOS47 and pemetrexed/carboplatin has been observed against the A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cell line. L-DOS47 has been shown in a previous phase I clinical trial to be safe and well tolerated at doses up to 13.55 µg/kg. The current phase I study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose of L-DOS47 in combination with pemetrexed/carboplatin. Methods: Stage IV (TNM M1a and M1b) histologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC patients (aged ≥18 yrs, ECOG PS ≤1) received up to four cycles of L-DOS47 in combination with standard of care doses of pemetrexed/carboplatin. L-DOS47 was administered weekly over 21 days in each treatment cycle. Seven planned dosing cohorts (0.59, 0.78, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0, 12.0 μg/kg) employed a standard 3+3 design for the first two and the last two cohorts, and an accelerated 1 + 2 design for the middle three cohorts. Dose levels of L-DOS47 were escalated following a review of safety data by the Trial Steering Committee. Results: Fourteen (14) patients were enrolled across 6 dosing cohorts before recruitment was halted. Median age was 65.1 years, with 50.0% male and 78.6% Caucasian. 57.1% of patients had an ECOG score of 0, and 42.9% had an ECOG score of 1. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) could not be determined as none of the patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). 50.0% of patients experienced at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) assessed as study drug-related, with 14.3% of patients experiencing at least one grade 3/4 drug-related toxicity. Of 12 patients evaluable for efficacy, 5 patients (41.7%) had a partial response (PR), 4 patients (33.3%) experienced stable disease (SD) and 3 patients (25.0%) had progressive disease (PD). The objective response rate is 41.7%. The clinical benefit rate is 75.0%. Conclusions: L-DOS47, in combination with pemetrexed/carboplatin, appears to be well tolerated with promising anti-tumor activity against non-squamous NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02309892.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→