MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Assessment of antegrade/retrograde cardioplegia by magnetic resonance technique

2006· article· en· W3029426284 on OpenAlexaff
Gang Li, 田伟忱, 李松梅, 蒋树林, Ganghong Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaNational Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingSurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的 应用磁共振技术评估相同流量下顺、逆行心肌灌注的效果.方法应用磁共振成像比较顺、逆行灌注离体猪心期间的T2*或T1信号曲线的相关性,用磷31磁共振图谱比较两种灌注方式对心肌能量代谢的影响.结果逆行灌注期间各T2*信号曲线的相关性(0.52±0.15)明显弱于顺行灌注(0.84±0.07).同样,逆灌期间各T1信号曲线的相关性(0.49±0.09)也明显弱于顺灌(0.86±0.12).而且逆行灌注需要比顺行灌注更高的流量才能维持正常能量代谢.结论与顺行灌注相比,逆行灌注时局部心肌灌注明显不均匀,而且逆灌维持正常能量代谢的能力也明显弱于顺灌。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular SurgerySame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207