Interpretation and inspiration of Guidance on Platelet Transfusion for Patients with Hypoproliferative Thrombocytopenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Guidance on Platelet Transfusion for Patients with Hypoproliferative Thrombocytopenia(hereinafter referred to as the Guide)was created by an international professional organization which composed of 24 national experts in blood transfusion from Britain, the United States, Canada, Germany, Belgium and Australia, in order to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia.They updated it in 2015.The author interpret the content of the Guide in seven respects: the need for prophylactic platelet transfusions, minimum platelet threshold, platelet transfusion dose, transfusion with same blood type, transfusion of RhD negative patients with RhD positive platelet, platelet cross matching test and comparison of the efficacy between apheresis platelets and concentrated plasma.Meanwhile the the status of the diagnosis and treatment of the disease are compared between at home and abroad.The Guide can provide a theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Key words: Thrombocytopenia; Platelet transfusion; Guidebooks
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".