MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029559510 · doi:10.3917/riges.452.0086

Le courage moral : une denrée rare ?

2020· article· fr· W3029559510 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jean-François Bertholet, Marie‐Claude Gaudet, Alexandre Rousseau

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Canadian institutionsHEC MontréalEmployment and Social Development CanadaRéseau Technoscience
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourageHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceSociologyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le contexte des organisations modernes, qu’est-ce que le courage ? Prendre une décision d’affaires risquée, faire les choses différemment, être radicalement transparent : voilà autant d’actions courageuses. Mais d’un point de vue moral, le courage consiste surtout à convertir ses intentions en actions malgré les pressions internes et externes subies au quotidien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.032
Scholarly communication0.0110.013
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism StudiesFrench-language works237,207