MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029619482 · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102280

Cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in peak skeletonized white matter mean diffusivity in cerebral amyloid angiopathy

2020· article· en· W3029619482 on OpenAlexafffund
Cheryl R. McCreary, Andrew E. Beaudin, Arsenije Subotic, Angela Zwiers, A. Álvarez, Anna Charlton, Bradley G. Goodyear, Richard Frayne, Eric E. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage Clinical · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreAlberta HealthUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of CalgaryAlzheimer SocietyFondation Brain CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsCerebral amyloid angiopathyNeuropsychologyAngiopathyNeurocognitiveMedicineBoston Naming TestInternal medicineDiffusion MRINeuropsychological testWhite matterPsychologyMagnetic resonance imagingAudiologyCardiologyCognitionPsychiatryDiseaseRadiologyDementiaEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that peak skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD), a measure of cerebral white matter microstructural disruption, is 1) increased in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) compared to normal control (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD); 2) associated with neuropsychological test performance among CAA patients; and 3) increased more quickly over one year in CAA than in AD, MCI, and NC. METHODS: Ninety-two participants provided a medical history, completed a neuropsychological assessment, and had a magnetic resonance (MR) exam including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) from which PSMD was calculated. A 75-minute neuropsychological test battery was used to derive domain scores for memory, executive function, and processing speed. Multivariable analyses controlling for age and sex (and education, for cognitive outcomes) were used to test the study hypotheses. RESULTS: /s) groups (p < .01). Among CAA patients, higher PSMD was associated with slower processing speed (estimated -0.22 standard deviation (SD) change in processing speed z score per SD increase in PSMD, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.03, p = .03), higher WMH volume [β = 0.74, CI 0.48 to 1.00], and higher CAA SVD score [β = 0.68, CI 0.24 to 1.21] but was not associated with MMSE, executive function, memory, CMB count, or cortical thickness. PSMD increased over 1-year in all groups (p < .01) but without rate differences between groups (p = .66). CONCLUSIONS: PSMD, a simple marker of diffuse global white matter heterogeneity, is increased in CAA. Our findings further support a role for white matter disruption in causing cognitive impairment in CAA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage ClinicalSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207