The influence of edaravone on cognitive ability in patients with vascular dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the influence of edaravone on the cognitive ability in patients with vascular dementia(VD).Methods 70 cases with mild to moderate VD were randomly divided into observation group( edaravone treatment) and control group( piracetarn treatment),35 cases in each group.Treatment cycle was two weeks.The scores of MMSE,CDT,MoCA were compared before and after treatment between the two groups.Results The scores were found to be significantly higher after use edaravone in the observation group ( t =4.21,1.45,12.37,all P ＜0.05 ).The score had no difference before and after treatment in the control group ( P ＞ 0.05 ).Conclusion Edaravone could improve cognitive abilitys in VD patients through its function of anti-oxidant and free-radical scavenging. Key words: Dementia,vascular; Cognition disorders; Edaravone injection; Piracetam
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".