Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction training on negative emotions in elderly patients with chronic heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To study the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) training on the negative emotions in elderly patients with chronic heart failure. Methods A total of 148 cases of elderly patients with chronic heart failure undergoing standard medication therapy for heart failure from February 2015 to February 2016 in the Internal Medicine-Cardiovascular Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were recruited and divided in to experimental group (n=72) and control group (n=76) randomly. The patients of the control group were given health education, which on the basis of health education, the patients of the experimental group received MBSR training. After eight weeks of training, the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH) were applied for patients' anxiety, depression and happiness in the two groups. Results After MBSR training, the scores of SAS, SDS and the negative score of MUNSH decreased in the experimental group (t=9.07, 2.59, 1.87; P<0.05). The positive and total score of MUNSH increased in the experimental group (t=4.19, 3.49; P<0.05). Conclusions MBSR training can improve anxiety, depression and subjective happiness in elderly patients with heart failure. Key words: Anxiety; Depression; Chronic heart failure; Mindfulness-based stress reduction; Subjective happiness
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".