MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3029754720 · doi:10.32597/theses/134

Seasonal Diet Variation in Thirteen-Lined Ground Squirrel (Ictidomys Tridecemlineatus) in Southernwestern Michigan

2019· dissertation· en· W3029754720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Austin Fabienne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmnivoreGround squirrelBiologyAnimal scienceGround levelZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thirteen-lined ground squirrels (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus) are omnivorous ground squirrels that range from Texas to Alberta and from Michigan to Utah. The amount and type of both animal and plant matter in their diet may vary both geographically and seasonally. The present study was motivated by prior work, based on δ13C analysis of incisor enamel of thirteen-lined ground squirrels from a colony in southwestern Michigan, suggesting that these animals underwent a pronounced, late-season shift in diet from predominantly C3 to C4 plants. However, this inferred dietary shift was not directly demonstrated. Here, I tracked diet of thirteen-lined ground squirrels in southwestern Michigan from June to October 2018 using fecal samples deposited by animals when live-trapped; squirrels were then released unharmed. In addition, I collected and identified voucher plant specimens at the field site. Microhistological and isotopic analyses of fecal samples documented two primary seasonal shifts in diet. First, the microhistological data indicated a sharp decrease in arthropod consumption as summer turned to fall; this decrease correlated with the overall decrease in δ15N and 1/C:N (carbon:nitrogen; a measure of trophic position and degree of carnivory). These observations were consistent with a shift from a protein-rich early summer diet rich in arthropods to a fall diet with less protein. Secondly, the microhistological data demonstrated a dramatic late-season increase in consumption of grass seeds and glumes, which mirrored a sharp increase in δ13C. Both of these data sets indicated a shift from primarily C3-plants to a mixed or primarily C4-plant diet in August, with a C4-rich diet continuing into October. In summary, my study a) documented a previously unknown shift from high to low use of arthropods, a pattern that is contrary to findings of prior studies, and b) confirmed the late-season shift from C3- to C4-plants previously inferred from enamel isotope data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies→French-language works237,207→