Management and Security Analysis of Blockchain Shard Storage for Monitoring Data on the State of Smart Substations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ubiquitous power Internet of Things (UPIoT) provides a crucial platform for energy reform. The key features of blockchain, namely, decentralization, openness, and transparency, are in line with the spirits of the UPIoT. By integrating blockchain and the UPIoT, this paper analyzes the security strategy of the state monitoring system (SMS) for smart substations, constructs a blockchain network for smart substations, and designs a shard storage and management for the proposed model. Unlike the existing plans, our plan shards the transaction data to be stored in the blockchain. The sharding both localizes the data storage system, and maintains the scalability of the security system. Security analysis shows that our plan keeps the information secure, reliable, and private, while reducing the storage occupation of each node. The research results promote the application of blockchain in smart substations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it