MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029794424 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2019-0294

Wear behavior of B<sub>4</sub>C reinforced Al 6063 matrix composite electrodes fabricated by stir casting method

2020· article· en· W3029794424 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. Mathalai Sundaram, B. Radha Krishnan, S. Harikishore, V. Vijayan

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrinell scaleMaterials scienceScanning electron microscopeComposite numberSurface roughnessComposite materialElectrodeMetallurgyUltimate tensile strength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the present study was to predict the surface topological characteristics of Al–B 4 C composite electrodes and oil hardened, non-shrinking (OHNS) die steel in the electrical discharge machining (EDM) process. The surface characteristics of the composite electrodes were evaluated using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and EDAX analysis. The surface roughness and hardness of the OHNS die steel were measured using a Stylus probe and Brinell hardness tester, respectively. The composite electrodes were prepared with Al 6063 and B 4 C materials. In the stir casting process, the two materials were mixed at the molten state at different compositions. The chemical composition of the composite electrodes were analyzed by SEM and EDAX testing. The surface roughness of the OHNS steel was measured using a Brinell hardness tester. Based on SEM and EDAX results, 92% Al 6063, 8% B 4 C produced the best surface roughness in OHNS die steel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Machining and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207