An approach based on machine learning techniques for forecasting Vietnamese consumers’ purchase behaviour
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main goal of this study is to investigate the classification capability of several machine learning (ML) techniques, including decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP) network, Nave Bayes, radial basis function (RBF) network, and support vector machine (SVM) for predicting purchase decisions. The application case is related to consumer purchase decisions of domestic goods in the context of Vietnam. Firstly, factors influencing Vietnamese consumers' purchase decision of domestic products were identified. Then, data from 240 consumers in Vietnam were collected. Different classifying models based on ML techniques were developed to analyse the sampling data after the performances of the models were evaluated and compared using confusion matrix, accuracy rate and several error indexes. The results indicate that the DT(J48) obtained the highest performance with the corrected prediction percentage of 91.6667%. The findings also show that machine-learning techniques can be used to explicitly in forecasting Vietnamese consumers' purchase behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it