Traditional Chinese medicine wax therapy combined with tripterygium wilfordii and methotrexate in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To study the clinical effects of traditional Chinese medicine wax therapy combined with tripterygium wilfordii and methotrexate in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods A total of 130 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who were treated in Houma People’s Hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were selected, and they were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 65 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with traditional Chinese medicine wax therapy and methotrexate, and patients in the observation group were treated with tripterygium wilfordii on the basis of the treatment of the control group. The plasma D-dimer, high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were compared before and 3 months after treatment between the two groups. And the improvement of the disease condition of the two groups was compared. Results After treatment, the plasma D-dimer, hs-CRP, ESR and WOMAC scores of the two groups were improved, which were significantly better than those preoperative levels (P<0.05). Moreover, the plasma D-dimer, hs-CRP, ESR and WOMAC scores of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group after treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the morning stiffness time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and number of joint swelling and pain, and number of joint tenderness in the observation group were less than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusions The treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis patients with traditional Chinese medicine wax therapy combined with tripterygium wilfordii and methotrexate is effective. Key words: Arthritis rheumatoid; Traditional Chinese medicine wax therapy; Tripterygium wilfordii; Methotrexate; Clinical efficacy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".