MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029888443 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.773

0777 Variations in Vigilance and Sleep Among Underground Mine Workers During 14 Consecutive Night Shifts

2020· article· en· W3029888443 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luc Laberge, Annik Lavigne, Julie Auclair, Marc Hébert

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCégep de Jonquière
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVigilance (psychology)DemographyShift workAudiologyMedicinePsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Adverse effects of night shift work are well known but there is scarce data on how vigilance and sleep vary across a large number of consecutive night shifts. Methods In summer, 38 underground miners (mean age (SD): 36.8 (13.9) years) wore an actigraph, filled out the Morningness-Eveningness questionnaire, and completed a Visual Analog Scale capturing subjective vigilance (very sleepy to very alert) 4 times per shift (19:00, 22:00, 02:00, and 05:30) for 14 consecutive night shifts. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to account for repeated measures. Results Mean vigilance level is lower at 22:00, 02:00 and 05:30 than at the beginning of the shift at 19:00 (p<0.001). Also, a more pronounced decrease in vigilance during the night was observed among older workers compared to younger workers (p<0.05). Moreover, workers with greater eveningness have higher vigilance at the beginning of the first night shift at 19:00 (p<0.001), but their decline in vigilance level during the night is faster than that observed in workers with greater morningness (p<0.01). Interestingly, the mean vigilance decline observed at 02:00 and 05:30 (compared to 19:00) is slowed down for each additional night shift (p<0.001). Furthermore, mean sleep efficiency is negatively associated with morningness and gradually decreases across consecutive night shifts (p<0.05). In addition, mean sleep duration is shorter in older workers and is positively associated with morningness (p<0.05). Conclusion Results show a progressive improvement in vigilance of mine workers assigned to a large number of consecutive 12-hour night shifts from 2 am onwards. This may probably be ascribed to an adjustment in homeostatic sleep propensity consecutive to the partial sleep deprivation associated with time spent traveling to the remote site before the first shift. However, circadian adjustment is unlikely considering the strong morning light exposure experienced daily after the night shift. Support College and Community Innovation Program of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (CUI2I 472201-14)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207