Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse au « retour » que fait le régionalisme, celui idyllique du début du xxe siècle, dans la littérature québécoise récente. Ce retour, plus précisément, rend compte de crimes dans un univers sachant difficilement les contenir. Dans Le discours sur la tombe de l’idiot (2008) de Julie Mazzieri, Le chasseur inconnu (2014) de Jean-Michel Fortier et Trois fois la bête (2015) de Zhanie Roy, nous rencontrons effectivement des meurtres, sans que les infrastructures ne permettent de les traiter : ni enquêteur, ni médecin légiste, ni quelque instance judiciaire n’apparaissent dans ces fictions. Une telle représentation du crime permet de conceptualiser ces oeuvres comme des « actualisations à distance », c’est-à-dire que le mouvement de retour s’avère sciemment problématisé selon les conceptions éthiques contemporaines. Par le biais des questions de l’origine et de l’autorité, comme interrogations au coeur de ces fictions critiques de l’idéal régionaliste, cet article entend éclairer ce geste de création important dans la production récente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".