L’enseignement et l’apprentissage de la lecture aux différents niveaux de la scolarité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage rassemble des travaux empiriques récents menés dans les différents pays francophones à propos des pratiques d’enseignement, des capacités et des difficultés des élèves et des étudiants en lecture, du primaire à l’université, en associant différentes dimensions. Il présente une dimension curriculaire dans sa structure même, puisqu’il envisage toute la scolarité obligatoire, du primaire jusqu’au lycée/Cégep/Secondaire II, au sein même de plusieurs articles. Il offre également une vision de l’enseignement de la lecture qui ne se limite pas à la lecture littéraire, mais s’étend aussi à celle des textes informatifs puisqu’au-delà de leurs spécificités, l’une et l’autre sollicitent des processus de compréhension et des composantes communs. Le livre propose enfin des comparaisons internationales entre les quatre pays francophones qui ont intégré l’approche par compétences à leurs curriculums : la Belgique, la France, le Québec et la Suisse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".