MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3030026364 · doi:10.1145/3318464.3380568

SCODED: Statistical Constraint Oriented Data Error Detection

2020· article· en· W3030026364 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Stream Mining Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)Computer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)Data miningStatistical modelKey (lock)Data integrityError detection and correctionData modelingAlgorithmMachine learningDatabaseEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statistical Constraints (SCs) play an important role in statistical modeling and analysis. This paper brings the concept to data cleaning and studies how to leverage SCs for error detection. SCs provide a novel approach that has various application scenarios and works harmoniously with downstream statistical modeling. Entailment relationships between SCs and integrity constraints provide analytical insight into SCs. We develop SCODED, an SC-Oriented Data Error Detection system, comprising two key components: (1) SC Violation Detection : checks whether an SC is violated on a given dataset, and (2) Error Drill Down : identifies the top-k records that contribute most to the violation of an SC. Experiments on synthetic and real-world data show that SCs are effective in detecting data errors that violate them, compared to state-of-the-art approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Stream Mining TechniquesFrench-language works237,207