Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penggambaran kedekatan kucing terdapat dalam berbagai folklor di berbagai belahan dunia. Pada masyarakat Sunda, kedekatan tersebut direpresentasikan dalam folklor lisan Nini Anteh dan permainan tradisional anak. Namun, kajian mendalam tentang keterkaitan keberadaan kucing dalam folklor lisan cerita rakyat Nini Anteh dan permainan tradisional anak belum pernah dilakukan. Oleh sebab itu, tujuan kajian ini adalah mengungkap representasi kucing dalam foklor lisan tersebut. Adapun metode penelitian adalah deskriptif-kualitatif dengan pengambilan data melalui studi pustaka serta wawancara mendalam pada informan yang dianggap memiliki enkulturasi penuh. Data yang telah diperoleh kemudian dianalisis meliputi alur, makna, dan fungsinya. Hasil dari analisa tersebut diperoleh bahwa kata kucing dalam permainan tradisional anak merepresentasikan identitas budaya lokal dan kolektif bagi masyarakat Sunda serta media pendidikan bagi anak. Sedangkan kucing dalam cerita rakyat Nini Anteh dipandang sebagai subjek yang penting sebagai representasi dari domestikasi Nini Anteh yang menempatkan perempuan sebagai subordinat dari laki-laki dan menimbulkan ketimpangan sosial berbasis identitas gender.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".