MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Follow-up study on improvement of vascular patency rate of vein bypass graft after coronary artery bypass grafting with medical chemical external stent

2019· article· en· W3030306689 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Longsheng Dai, Mingxin Gao, Wenyuan Yu, Bo Li, Chengxiong Gu, Yang Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArteryAnginaSurgeryCardiologyCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyVeinInternal medicineMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and clinical significance of medical chemical glue as an external stent in improving the fluency rate of venous bypass graft after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods Randomly selected 200 patients from April 2010 to December 2016 included who were underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in Beijing Anzhen Hospital. All patients had different degrees of angina, and coronary angiography showed multi-branches artery lesion. They were randomly divided into two groups, 100 in each group. Spray gel group: coronary artery bypass grafting simultaneously spraying medical chemical glue on the surface of the bridge vessel. Unsprayed gel group: simple coronary artery bypass grafting. All 200 patients were followed up in June 2018. The follow-up content mainly included: recent recurrence of angina pectoris, recent echocardiography and electrocardiogram report, coronary CTA or coronary angiography results, and current living conditions. The data obtained were collectively summarized and compared. Results The follow-up rate was 96% in the sprayed group, and 92% in the unsprayed group. Compared with the unsprayed group , the incidence of chest pain and angina pectoris was significantly lower in the sprayed group(23.96% vs. 40.22%, P<0.05), the venous occlusion rate of the vein bypass graft in the sprayed group was significantly lower(29.17% vs. 55.43%, P<0.01), the probability of death due to cardiac causes in the sprayed group was significant decrease(1.04% vs. 6.52%, P<0.05), the number of patients with the main adverse cardiac and cerebral events(MACCE) in the sprayed group was significantly lower(9.38% vs. 21.74%, P<0.01), all with statistically significant differences. The number of patients with heart failure and recurrent myocardial infarction was lower in the sprayed group, but there were no statistically significant differences. Conclusion Medical chemical glue as an external stent does play a role in improving the venous patency rate after coronary artery bypass grafting, and it is reliable for the prevention and treatment of vein bypass vascular stenosis after coronary artery bypass grafting. Key words: Medical chemical glue; External stent; Vein bypass graft; Restenosis; Coronary artery bypass grafting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery→Same topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques→French-language works237,207→