A randomized phase III trial of secondary cytoreductive surgery in later recurrent ovarian cancer: SOC1/SGOG-OV2.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
6001 Background: In China, secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) has been standard of care in some high volume cancer centers for ovarian cancer (OC) and most pts prefer surgery over the past two decades. Although GOG213 showed no OS benefit, the debate on selected pts and the conflict with certain local clinical care is still open. Methods: Pts with 1st relapsed OC after 6m+ platinum-free interval (PFI) were eligible if predicted to be a potential R0 by iMODEL score combined with PET-CT image and were randomized to SCR followed by chemotherapy (surgery arm) vs 2nd line chemotherapy alone (no surgery arm). Co-primary endpoint is PFS and OS. The 2nd endpoint is accumulated treatment-free survival (TFSa), which was defined as the overall survival time minus the time of surgery and chemotherapy after randomization. We report analysis of PFS and interim analysis of TFSa. Results: 357 pts were randomized 2012-2019. 6.3% of 175 pts were operated in no surgery arm and cross-over rate was 36.9% in 2nd+ relapsed pts of no surgery arm. 97% and 96% of pts received a platinum-containing 2nd line therapy. Complete resection (R0) rate was 76.7% in overall and 61.1% in pts with iMODEL> 4.7. 60 d mortality rates were 0 % in both surgery and no surgery arm. Postoperative 30 d complication rate with ≥ grade 3 was 5.2%. The median follow-up was 36.0 m. Median PFS was 17.4 m and 11.9 m in surgery and no surgery arm, respectively (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.74, p < 0.001). Median time to start of first subsequent therapy (TFST) was 18.1 m vs 13.6 m in favor of the surgery arm (HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.46-0.76). 1.1% and 10.1% of pts underwent Bevacizumab and PARPi maintenance in the 2nd line therapy. The OS and TFSa was immatured. The median TFSa was unreached and 39.5 m in R0 subgroup and no surgery arm, respectively (HR0.59, 95%CI 0.38-0.91). TFSa in surgery arm showed a better long-term survival than that in no surgery group (restricted mean survival time from 60 to 72m: 6.2m vs 4.2m). Conclusions: SCR in selected pts resulted in a dramatically significant extension of PFS. The interim analysis of TFSa indicate that SCR might contribute to long-term survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".