Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter examines two inter-Asian festivals that reckon with difficult histories in East Asia: the BeSeTo Theatre Festival and the Gwangju Media Arts Festival. What makes these festivals significant is that they give artists indigenous to the host countries pride of place. Although there are many theatre festivals in East Asia, many bring works from Western auteur directors, drawing audiences largely from elsewhere. These festivals are distinct in promoting exchanges among Asian artists, practicing the dauntingly vast concept that is (inter-)Asian theatre from locally informed and historically specific perspectives. Production examples such as Han Tae-sook’s Princess Dukhye (1995) and Issac Chong Wai’s One Sound of the Futures (2016) demonstrate the potency of festivals in engaging with vexed histories of state violence, Japanese imperialism, and British colonialism that constitute the contemporary relations of China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Korea. They render the festivals politically effective platforms where difficult historical memories are addressed and local residents made co-creators. They nurture rather than restrict the social and cultural work that festivals perform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".