Clinical observation on Quyu-Huatan decoction combined with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in treatment with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome with phlegm dampness type
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the clinical effect of Quyu-Huatan decoction combined with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in treatment with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome with phlegm dampness type. Methods A total of 64 patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome with phlegm dampness type were divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table method, with 32 cases in each group. The control group received routine clinical treatment combined with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, while the observation group was treated with Quyu-Huatan decoction on the basis of the control group. After 4 weeks of treatment, the polysomnography (PSG) index (the apnea hypopnea index, AHI, the Oxygen saturation, SaO2, the pulse pressure, PP, the longest apnea time), the degree of lethargy (Epworth sleepiness scale, ESS), the quality of sleep (Pittsburgh sleep quality index, PSQI) and the quality of life (Calgary mass index of life quality index, SAQLI) before and after the treatment of two groups were observed, and the clinical effect was compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 87.5% (28/32), which was significantly higher than that 68.8% (22/32) of the control group (Z=-3.187, P=0.000). After treatment, the AHI (8.59 ± 0.93 times/h vs. 18.62 ± 2.44 times/h, t=5.735), the PP (35.96 ± 4.02 mmHg vs. 43.33 ± 4.70 mmHg, t=5.083) and the longest apnea time (11.93 ± 1.86 s vs. 17.94 ± 2.43 s, t=4.863) of the observation group were significant lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), while the SaO2 content (93.07% ± 10.03% vs. 82.36% ± 9.37%, t=5.812) of the observation group were significant higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the ESS (5.33 ± 0.33 vs. 8.73 ± 0.96, t=4.682) and the PSQI (2.25 ± 0.31 vs. 5.68 ± 0.77, t=4.872) of the observation group were significant lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), and the SAQLI (6.12 ± 0.59 vs. 4.36 ± 0.53, t=4.631) of the observation group were significant higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions The application of Quyu-Huatan decoction combined with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in treatment with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome with phlegm dampness type can improve sleep disordered breathing, relieve drowsiness, and improve sleep quality and quality of life. Key words: Sleep apnea syndromes; Sleep apnea, obstructive; Quyu-Huatan decoction; Intermittent positive-pressure ventilation; Sleep disorders; Quality of life
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it