MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3030509359 · doi:10.1353/imp.2020.0009

Ivan L. Rudnytsky: Historian, Public Figure, and Political Thinker

2020· article· en· W3030509359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAb imperio · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianCommunismPoliticsNazismContext (archaeology)BiographyWorld War IINazi GermanyJudaismSpanish Civil WarHistoryLawClassicsPolitical scienceEconomic historyArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Almost no twentieth-century historian has had as profound an influence on current Ukrainian historical writing as Ivan Lysiak-Rudnyts'kyi, aka Ivan L. Rudnytsky (1919–1984). Together with George Luckyj (Iurii Luts'kyi, 1919–2001) and Omeljan Pritsak (1919–2006), he belonged to the "generation of 1919." Even though his academic career was less successful than theirs, he seems to have left behind a more lasting intellectual legacy matching his remarkable life. He was born in Vienna in 1919 and raised in interwar Lviv/Lwów – a city that was torn by ethnic tensions between Poles, Ukrainians, and Jews. Rudnytsky did not succumb to temptations of communism or fascism. He managed to flee the Soviet occupation in 1939 and survived the war under Nazi rule as a university student in Berlin and Prague. After the war he moved to the United States, where he tried to pursue an academic career in 1951–1971, until he obtained a stable position as a tenured professor in Canada. His biography is full of dramatic turns: being half-Jewish, he was blackmailed by Ukrainian nationalists under the Nazis; while in the United States, he was denounced during the MсСarthy era and refused security clearance by the CIA. His cause célèbre was a letter sent in 1967 to Leonid Brezhnev and other Soviet leaders, in which he demanded the liberalization of politics in Soviet Ukraine. These episodes set the context for the analysis of his vision of Ukrainian history. Резюме: Мало кто из историков ХХ века оказал такое глубокое влияние на современную украинскую историографию, как Иван Лысяк-Рудницкий (1919–1984). Наряду с Юрием Луцким (1919–2001) и Омельяном Прицаком (1919–2006) он относился к "поколению 1919 года". Хотя, по сравнению с ними, карьера Рудницкого была менее успешной, он оставил после себя, пожалуй, более выдающееся интеллектуальное наследие, соответствующее его насыщенной жизни. Он родился в 1919 г. в Вене и вырос в межвоенном Львове (Львiв / Lwów), раздираемом этническими противоречиями между поляками, украинцами и евреями. Рудницкий не поддался соблазну коммунизма и фашизма. Он смог бежать от советской оккупации в 1939 г. и пережил войну при нацистах в качестве студента в Берлине и Праге. После войны он перебрался в США, где пытался построить академическую карьеру в 1951–1971 гг., пока не получил постоянную профессуру в Канаде. Его биография полна драматических поворотов: как полуеврея, его шантажировали украинские националисты при нацистах; в США его преследовали в годы маккартизма, и он не прошел проверку благонадежности в ЦРУ. Противоречивую реакцию вызвало письмо с требованием либерализации политики в советской Украине, которое в 1967 г. он направил на имя Леонида Брежнева и других высших руководителей СССР. В публикуемой статье эти эпизоды воссоздают контекст для анализа исторических воззрений Рудницкого.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it