MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3030593298 · doi:10.1628/978-3-16-158939-3

Luthers Schriften für die Gegenwart

2020· book· de· W3030593298 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Keßler

Bibliographic record

VenueMohr Siebeck eBooks · 2020
Typebook
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDie (integrated circuit)PhilosophyArtTheologyComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

What would it take to make an edition of Luthers works popular today? Exploring this question, Martin Keßlers study highlights two unknown editorial projects, the Little Weimar Edition of Luthers Works and Luthers Authentic Works, and also traces the beginnings of Kurt Alands Luther deutsch, one of the most widespread editions of post-war Germany, back to the year 1942.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMohr Siebeck eBooksSame topicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207