Relationship between the expression of microRNA-16, microRNA-124 and microRNA-195 in peripheral blood of schizophrenic patients and their cognitive and social functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the correlation between the expression of microRNA-16, mircoRNA-124 and mircoRNA-195 in peripheral blood of schizophrenic patients and their cognitive and social functions. Methods From January 2016 to December 2018, 112 schizophrenic patients admitted to the Second People's Hospital of Taizhou were selected as observation group, and 93 healthy examinees from the Second People's Hospital of Taizhou were selected as control group.The expression of mircoRNA-16, mircoRNA 124 and mircoRNA 195 in peripheral blood was detected by real-time quantitative fluorescent PCR.The cognitive function of patients was evaluated by Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), and the social function of inpatients with mental illness was evaluated by SSPI. Results The expression of mircoRNA-16 (0.03±0.01) and mircoRNA 195(0.08±0.03) in peripheral blood of the observation group was lower than that of the control group[(0.12±0.02) and (0.27±0.06)], while the expression of mircoRNA 124 (14.63±3.24) of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (7.45±1.39), the differences were statistically significant(t=41.763, 19.898, 29.389, all P<0.05). The score of MoCA scale in the observation group[(22.17±3.45)points]was lower than that in the control group[(28.39±1.28)points](t=16.465, P<0.05). The SSPI score of the observation group[(26.58±5.16)points]was lower than that of the control group[(45.37±3.27)points](t=30.405, P<0.05). MicroRNA-16 and microRNA-195 were positively correlated with MoCA scale score and SSPI scale score (r=0.641, 0.724, SSPI scale score: r=0.801, 0.657, all P<0.05), while microRNA-124 was negatively correlated with MoCA scale score and SSPI scale score (r=-0.738, -0.769, all P<0.05). Conclusion The expression of mircoRNA-16 and mircoRNA-195 in peripheral blood of schizophrenic patients decreased, while the expression of mircoRNA-124 increased.The expressions of mircoRNA-16 and mircoRNA-195 were positively correlated with cognitive and social functions, while mircoRNA-124 was negatively correlated with cognitive and social functions. Key words: Schizophrenia; Healthy examinees; Peripheral blood; MicroRNA-16; MicroRNA-124; MicroRNA-195; Cognitive function; Social function; Relevance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".