MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of Calgary sleep apnea quality of life index in diagnosis and treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome

2007· article· en· W3030861065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
林其昌, 黄鸿波, 陈公平, 丁海波, 唐爱忠

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Asthma · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObstructive sleep apneaSleep (system call)Sleep apneaApnea–hypopnea indexHypopneaApneaQuality of life (healthcare)Index (typography)Physical therapyInternal medicinePolysomnography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的 探讨Calgary睡眠呼吸暂停生活质量指数(SAQLI)在中国阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者诊断与治疗随访中的地位.方法 确诊为中重度OSAHS并接受无创持续正压通气(nCPAP)患者连续入选68例,设为治疗组;按年龄、性别、身高、体质量等因素进行均衡纳入中重度OSAHS且未接受任何针对OSAHS治疗的患者68例,设为对照组.治疗前、治疗后1个月、治疗后2个月分别采用SAQLI评估其生活质量,分析基础状态下SAQLI评分与病情的相关关系及治疗前后SAQLI变化水平;并统计平均CPAP使用时间,采用多元逐步回归分析其预测因素.结果 SAQLI总分与OSAHS病情存在弱相关关系;有效CPAP治疗后SAQLI评分改善(P<0.01),而对照组SAQLI评分没有显著变化(P>0.05);多元逐步回归分析发现SAQLI基础评分及SaO2<90%时间是平均CPAP使用时间的独立预测因素.结论 SAQLI量表可用于中国OSAHS患者病情评估及疗效判定;SAQLI基础评分及SaO2<90%时间可作为OSAHS治疗指征制定的参考指标。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of AsthmaSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207