Effects of Heterogeneous Surroundings on the Efficacy of Continuous Radiofrequency for Pain Relief
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This numerical study highlights the deviation between the predicted lesion volume of the homogeneous and heterogeneous models of the continuous radiofrequency (RF) procedure for pain relief. A three-dimensional computational domain comprising of a realistic anatomy of the target tissue has been considered in the present study. A comparative analysis has been conducted for three different scenarios: (a) completely homogenous domain comprising of only muscle tissue, (b) heterogeneous domain comprising of nerve and muscle tissues, and (c) heterogeneous domain comprising of bone, nerve and muscle tissues. Finite-element-based simulations have been performed for computing the temperature and electrical field distributions during the continuous RF procedures for treating chronic pain. The predicted results reveal that the consideration of heterogeneity within the computational domain results in distorted electric field distribution and leads to the significant reduction in the attained lesion volume during the continuous RF application for pain relief.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it