Epididymal proteins Binder of SPerm Homologs 1 and 2 (BSPH1/2) are dispensable for male fertility and sperm motility in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The binder of sperm family of proteins has been reported to be indispensable for sperm maturation and capacitation. However, their physiological functions in fertility have only been studied in vitro. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was utilized to generate double knockout (DKO) mice by simultaneously targeting the two murine binder of sperm genes, Bsph1 and Bsph2. To confirm that the homologous genes and proteins were completely eliminated in the DKO mice, different methods such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, digital droplet-polymerase chain reaction and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry were applied. Bsph1/2 DKO male mice were bred by intercrossing. Compared to wild type counterparts, male Bsph1/2 null mice, lacking BSPH1/2 proteins, were fertile with no differences in sperm motility and sperm count. However, the weights of male pups were significantly increased in Bsph1/2 double knockout mice in a time dependent manner spanning days 6 and 21, as well as 6 weeks of age. No change was detected in the weights of female pups during the same period. Taken together, these data indicate that BSPH1/2 proteins are dispensable for male fertility in mice but may influence growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".