MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Socio-demographic risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonates:A Meta-analysis

2014· article· en· W3030948483 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
肖政, 汪成琼, 黄榜江, 楚亚林, 胡世芸, 张啟鹏, 邱隆敏, 余昌胤

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œJournal of practical nursing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdds ratioVentilator-associated pneumoniaMedicineMeta-analysisPneumoniaInternal medicineGestational ageCase-control studyPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To provide the evidences for the early-warning strategies of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in neonates,we systematically reviewed all related studies and analyzed the socio-demographic risk factors of VAP in neonates.Methods We retrieved all related studies in CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,CBM,Pubmed and Embase and evaluated their risk of bias by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and analyzed all data by Meta-analysis.Results There were 21 case-control studies involving 3 546 neonates and 1 201 VAP patients and 6 socio-demographic risk factors of VAP in neonates being included.The odds ratio of deaths had significant differences between VAP and non VAP group (OR=2.98).Five studies involving 1 031 neonates were included,the average hospitalization days was significantly different between VAP and non-VAP group (MD=9.33).The average gestational age was significandy different between VAP and non-VAP group (MD =-3.05) and the odds ratio of VAP was significantly different between ≤ 37 w group and >37 w group (OR=2.62),between 32~37 w group and >37 w group (OR=2.37) and between <32 w group and 32~37 w group (OR=2.72).Nineteen studies involving 3 238 neonates were included,the average weight was significantly different between VAP and non-VAP group (MD=-0.58) and the odds ratio of VAP was significantly different between<2.5 kg and ≥2.5 kg group(OR=3.75),between 1.5~2.5 kg and >2.5 kg group (OR=2.42) and between <1.5 kg and 1.5~2.5 kg group (OR=3.02).Conclusions In neonates,VAP is an important cause of death which prolongs hospitalization and increases economic burden.Our study confirms that the gestational age (≤37 w) and weight(<2.5 kg) increase the risk of VAP and all neonates with lower weight and smaller gestational age have higher risk of VAP.Therefore,the weight and gestational age are important risk and early-warning factors. Key words: Neonates;  Ventilator-associated pneumonia;  Socio-demographic risk factors;  Meta-analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.046
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œJournal of practical nursingSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207