MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association of mild cognitive impairment with coronary artery disease in elderly patients

2017· article· en· W3030967081 on OpenAlex
Zhe Yang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œJournal of practical nursing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicineConfidence intervalRisk factorLogistic regressionCoronary artery diseaseCardiologyCognitive impairmentDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the relationship between coronary artery disease, other vascular risk factors and mild cognitive impairment in elderly patients. Methods A total of 196 inpatients were collected from the departments of cardiovascular internal medicine from April to September 2015.The unified questionnaires of cognitive status and standardized survey were developed. The patients were divided into 133 cases of mild cognitive impairment and 63 cases of cognitively normal by Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale. The patients were divided into 79 cases of coronary heart disease and 117 cases of negative control by coronary angiography. Coronary artery disease and other vascular risk factors for mild cognitive impairment were analyzed. Results The levels of education and proportion of coronary heart disease were (9.23±4.34) years and 45.9%(61/133) in mild cognitive impairment patients, and (12.27±3.79) years and 28.6% (18/63) in cognitively normal patients. There were significant differences between the two(t = 4.77, P< 0.05, χ2=5.31, P< 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that degree of education was a protective factor for mild cognitive impairment with odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 0.91 and P = 0.00. Coronary heart disease was an independent risk factor for mild cognitive impairment (OR=2.02, 95%CI 1.03 to 4.00; P = 0.04) . The total scores of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale and delayed memory were (20.9±4.8), (22.4±5.6) points and (2.1±1.6), (2.6±1.8) points in coronary heart disease and negative control patients. There were significant differences between the two (t=1.98, 4.77, all P<0.05). Conclusions The degree of education is a protective factor for mild cognitive impairment. Coronary heart disease is an independent risk factor for mild cognitive impairment, and it mainly impairs delayed memory ability. Key words: Coronary artery disease; Cognition disorders; Risk factors; Neuropsychological tests; Aged

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it