MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3030978102

Exact Maximum Expected Differential and Linear Probability for 2-Round Advanced Encryption Standard (AES).

2005· preprint· en· W3030978102 on OpenAlexaff
Liam Keliher, Jiayuan Sui

Bibliographic record

VenueIACR Cryptology ePrint Archive · 2005
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear cryptanalysisBlock cipherAdvanced Encryption StandardUpper and lower boundsEncryptionMathematicsDifferential cryptanalysisDifferential (mechanical device)Impossible differential cryptanalysisValue (mathematics)Provable securityComputer scienceAlgorithmStatisticsComputer securityPhysicsMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Provable security of a block cipher against di#erential / linear cryptanalysis is based on the maximum expected di#erential / linear probability (MEDP / MELP) over T 2 core rounds. Over the past few years, several results have provided increasingly tight upper and lower bounds in the case T = 2 for the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.013
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIACR Cryptology ePrint ArchiveSame topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207