MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031169117 · doi:10.18162/fp.2020.a193

La critique des idéologies comme prémisse au développement de la pensée réflexive

2020· article· fr· W3031169117 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kim Samson

Bibliographic record

VenueFormation et profession · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De nombreux dispositifs d' enseignement et d'apprentissage dans les diffrentes disciplines scolaires, que ce soit le cercle littraire en franais ou la communaut de recherche philosophique en thique et culture religieuse, visent le dveloppement de l' esprit critique en favorisant la mise distance de l'interprtation d'une oeuvre littraire (Sauvaire, 2013) ou en invitant les lves penser par eux-mmes Trop souvent prsent dans sa formule doxique, l' esprit critique serait cette mise distance des prjugs et des ides reues de la collectivit desquels le sujet doit s' extirper, le rduisant ainsi au statut de fausse conscience. Nous croyons que cette dfinition restreint quelque peu notre comprhension des discours idologiques. C' est pourquoi nous souhaitons, dans le cadre de cet article, enrichir la rflexion sur l' esprit critique en ducation en nous rfrant aux rflexions du

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.366
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFormation et professionSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207