La critique des idéologies comme prémisse au développement de la pensée réflexive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De nombreux dispositifs d' enseignement et d'apprentissage dans les diffrentes disciplines scolaires, que ce soit le cercle littraire en franais ou la communaut de recherche philosophique en thique et culture religieuse, visent le dveloppement de l' esprit critique en favorisant la mise distance de l'interprtation d'une oeuvre littraire (Sauvaire, 2013) ou en invitant les lves penser par eux-mmes Trop souvent prsent dans sa formule doxique, l' esprit critique serait cette mise distance des prjugs et des ides reues de la collectivit desquels le sujet doit s' extirper, le rduisant ainsi au statut de fausse conscience. Nous croyons que cette dfinition restreint quelque peu notre comprhension des discours idologiques. C' est pourquoi nous souhaitons, dans le cadre de cet article, enrichir la rflexion sur l' esprit critique en ducation en nous rfrant aux rflexions du
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.057 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".