MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of GC4419 (avasopasem manganese) on chronic kidney disease in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation and cisplatin.

2020· article· en· W3031186117 on OpenAlexaff
Emily J. Steinbach, Varun Monga, Muhammad Furqan, Douglas Laux, Diana Zepeda‐Orozco, Jennifer G. Jetton, Deborah Saunders, Neal Dunlap, Amarinthia Curtis, Robert K. Fairbanks, Sarah Bell, Carryn M. Anderson, Robert A. Beardsley, Jon Holmlund, Douglas R. Spitz, Bryan G. Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsNortheast Cancer CentreHealth Sciences North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseRenal functionMucositisInternal medicineHead and neck cancerPlaceboCancerPopulationNephrotoxicityCreatinineAdverse effectAcute kidney injuryUrologyRadiation therapySurgeryKidneyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

12071 Background: Nephrotoxicity is a major complication of platinum-based chemotherapy and ranges in incidence from 31-68%. The effects of platinum-based chemotherapeutics on long-term renal outcomes (chronic kidney disease, CKD) profoundly affect morbidity and mortality. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) including cisplatin is standard for locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (HNC) but is accompanied by the risk of CKD. In a randomized, multi-center, placebo-controlled Phase 2b trial ( NCT02508389 ) of GC4419 (avasopasem manganese) in HNC patients receiving CRT, avasopasem reduced the duration, incidence, and severity of severe oral mucositis (Anderson et al, JCO 2019). Avasopasem did not appear to alter the safety profile of CRT in that trial, including incidence of adverse events of kidney injury or azotemia. Methods: Pre- and post-treatment markers of kidney function including blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (sCr), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were retrospectively evaluated for a subset of 52 of the trial patients who received 3 cycles x 100 mg/m2 cisplatin plus placebo or 30 or 90 mg of avasopasem intravenously prior to RT, and 7 comparator patients who received the same CRT outside the study. Kidney function was evaluated between 3- and 24-months post-completion of cisplatin-radiation therapy by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD staging. Results: Baseline patient characteristics were skewed towards a male population but were balanced across all treatment arms with regards to baseline kidney function (comparator + placebo, n = 19; 30 mg GC4419, n = 18; 90 mg GC4419, n = 15). Treatment with 90 mg GC4419 demonstrated normal BUN values (10-20 mg/dL) at 3, 6, and 18 months and normal sCr values (0.6-1.2 mg/dL) between 3 and 24 months as compared to the placebo arm + comparator group, which exhibited statistically elevated BUN and sCr (p < 0.05). Treatment with 90 mg GC4419 also demonstrated significantly higher eGFR between 3 and 24 months post-chemoradiation (p < 0.05) compared to the placebo arm + comparator group. 90 mg GC4419 treatment significantly reduced the incidence of CKD compared to the placebo arm and comparator group, as determined by fold change in sCr values and eGFR measurements < 60 mL/min (stage G3a/b, G4, or G5 CKD). Conclusions: Avasopasem has the potential to reduce the incidence and severity of CKD in patients receiving cisplatin therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02508389 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207