Risk factors of vascular cognitive impairment in patients after stroke at early stage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To analyze the risk factors of vascular cognitive impairment in patients after stroke at early stage,Methods Three hundred patients with stroke at early stage were chosen in our study; their age,gender,levels of blood pressure,lipids and HbA1c,homocysteine (Hcy),and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP),atrial fibrillation,smoking,drinking and lesion sites were detected.Based on the scores in Montreal Cognitive Scale 30 d after the onset,statistical analysis was performed on the above factors.Results Univariate analysis showed that age,atrial fibrillation,levels of HbA1c and blood pressure,lesion sites,HS-CRP level,and Hcy level were significantly associated with the vascular cognitive impairment.Further logistic regression analysis indicated that levels of HbA1c and blood pressure,and lesion sites,and HS-CRP and Hcy levels were the independent risk factors (OR=1.489,P=0.021,95％CI:1.054～1.956; OR=1.134,P=0.027,95％CI:1.011～1.130; OR=3.124,P=0.028,95％CI:1.167～3.012; OR=2.476,P=0.029,95％CI:1.897～2.245; OR=2.132,P=0.032,95％CI:1.097～2.323).Conclusion Levels of HbA1c and blood pressure,and lesion sites,and HS-CRP and Hcy levels can serve as the predictive indexes of vascular cognitive impairment in patients after stroke at early stage. Key words: Stroke; Vascular cognitive impairment; Risk factor
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".