MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CNS outcomes in EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC patients with brain metastases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

2020· article· en· W3031239197 on OpenAlexaff
David Shultz, Sally C. M. Lau, Christopher Poletes, Lisa W. Le, Kate M. Mackay, Frances A. Shepherd, Penelope Ann Bradbury, Natasha B. Leighl, Geoffrey Liu, Adrian G. Sacher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineOncologyCumulative incidenceCohortRadiation therapyChemotherapyIncidence (geometry)Lung cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e14505 Background: Anti-tumor lymphocytes activated in response to ICIs may cross the blood brain barrier with effect on brain metastases (BM). Preliminary evidence suggests that ICIs alone are effective for melanoma BMs. However, the ability of ICI to effectively control NSCLC BMs without radiotherapy is controversial. By comparing serial MRIs and patterns of progression in ICI and chemotherapy treated patients, we sought to investigate the role of ICI in BM control in NSCLC patients. Methods: Serial MRIs were reviewed in ICI treated NSCLC patients with known BMs. Eligible patients must have a minimum of one baseline MRI and a follow-up within 3 months of CNS directed treatment. Patients with EGFR/ ALK mutations were excluded. A control cohort of patients who had never received ICIs was selected using the same criteria. The primary outcome was cumulative CNS progression and intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) analyzed using an accelerated failure time model and competing risk analysis. Results: We identified 137 ICI treated NSCLC patients with known BMs. After excluding for patients without serial MRIs, we analyzed 40 ICI treated patients and 39 controls. All patients received upfront radiotherapy or surgery and the modality used was similar (p = 0.13). CNS failure was less common in the ICI group (p = 0.02). ICI treated patients had a trend to longer iPFS in the PD-L1 ≥50% subgroup (p = 0.058). Cumulative incidence of progressive BM at 12 and 24 months were significantly lower in the ICI treated PD-L1 ≥50% subgroup: 19%/19% vs 50%/56% (p = 0.02). Patients in the PD-L1 ≥50% subgroup who achieved a systemic partial response (n = 10) did not experience any CNS events despite extracranial progression in some. Conclusions: Durable CNS disease control is observed with ICIs in NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥50% and demonstrates a high level of concordance with systemic response. The need for radiotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% disease should be investigated and may be reasonably delayed in asymptomatic patients with small BMs. Importantly, the same trend was not observed in PDL1 < 50% patients and caution is needed in employing this strategy in this subset of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207