MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031268248 · doi:10.7202/1068790ar

La conquête, la liberté et l’adaptation franco-américaine au Pays des Illinois, 1778-17871

2020· article· fr· W3031268248 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Robert Englebert, Bronwyn Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire de l Amérique française · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dès l’arrivée des premiers négociants de la traite des fourrures et des missionnaires, le Pays des Illinois se définit par une série d’accommodations culturelles et politiques. Quand des soldats virginiens arrivent à Kaskaskia en 1778, ils sont les porte-paroles du troisième régime impérial dans la région à prendre place en quinze ans. Les Créoles français cherchent à affirmer leur autonomie politique et culturelle sous cette nouvelle occupation américaine, tout comme ils l’avaient fait sous les régimes français et britannique. Cet article examine les efforts et les tactiques des Créoles français pour résister à l’hégémonie américaine émergente au Pays des Illinois pendant et après la Révolution américaine. Une comparaison des revendications et des actes de résistance à Kaskaskia et à Cahokia démontre que les Créoles de la région vont réussir à faire valoir leurs droits, tout en créant les fondements d’une nouvelle identité franco-américaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire de l Amérique françaiseSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207