MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031310476 · doi:10.29292/jics.v15i1.100

Enhancing Side Channel Attack-Resistance of the STTL Combining Multi-Vt Transistors with Capacitance and Current Paths Counterbalancing

2020· article· en· W3031310476 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vitor G. Lima, Guilherme Paim, Rodrigo N. Wuerdig, Leandro M. G. Rocha, Leomar da Rosa Júnior, Felipe Marques, Vinícius Valduga de Almeida Camargo, Eduardo Costa, Rafael Soares, Sérgio Bampi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrated Circuits and Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do SulCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNSCAD University
KeywordsSide channel attackComputer sciencePower analysisTransistorExploitLogic gateElectrical engineeringEmbedded systemElectronic engineeringCryptographyEngineeringVoltageComputer securityAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differential power analysis (DPA) exploits the difference between the instantaneous power of the circuit arches transitions to stole the state as information aiming to unveil the cryptographic key. Secure triple track logic (STTL) is a circuit-level countermeasure to DPA attacks based on dual-rail precharge logic (DPL). STTL is robust to attacks due to the delay in an insensitive feature that mitigates the logic glitches generated by the different path delays that lead to the logic gate inputs until they stabilize. The main STTL drawback, however, is the asymmetry of the transistor topology. Asymmetry causes unbalanced internal capacitances and different internal paths for the current flow, and DPA exploits it as a source of information leakage. Our work proposes three circuit topologies, combining multi-Vt transistors with a circuit counterbalancing strategy, aiming to improve the STTL DPA attack-resistance. Data encryption standard substitution-box circuit, designed in a TSMC 40 nm CMOS process, is our application case study to evaluate the DPA attack-resistance. Results gathered at the application-level show that our proposals outperform DPA attack-resistance of the prior work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Integrated Circuits and SystemsSame topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207