MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On using a hybrid power plant on military tracked and wheeled vehicles

2020· article· en· W3031363634 on OpenAlex
V. V. Hlebov, U. M. Huzhva, V. M. Koroliov, Sergii Strimovskyi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMilitary Technical Collection · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHybrid powerAutomotive engineeringPower stationEngineeringTraction power networkBattery packPower (physics)Lead–acid batteryBattery (electricity)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the areas for improving military tracked and wheeled vehicles is considered, nmely the use a hybrid power plant. A problem is determining the effectiveness of using a hybrid power plant in military vehicles. An analysis of foreign samples the military tracked and wheeled vehicles with an integrated hybrid power plant and their technical characteristics is carried out. A selection of traction electrical equipment for the construction a hybrid power plant for a tank and an armored personnel carrier was made. The technical characteristics of traction electric motors are considered: SUMO HD HV3500-9P company DANA (Canada), EMRAX 348 company Enstroj (Slovenia); traction Li-ion battery company WB Electronic (Poland), SUMO HP HV900-3P motor generator (LSG130 generator) DANA company (Canada).A study was done on the composing а components of the hybrid power plant in engine and transmission compartment and the hull of the T-72 tank, BMT-72 heavy infantry fighting vehicle and BTR-4MV1 armored personnel carrier. The study was conducted by modeling and comparative analysis. The simulation was carried out in a computer-aided design system Creo Parametric 2.0.As a result of the study, the technical characteristics of the BMT-72 and BTR-4MV1 products were determined with the introduction of a hybrid power plant on them. It was found that the use of a hybrid power plant on the BMT-72 product did not lead to improvement in speed characteristics and increase the power reserve, in addition to ensuring movement on traction batteries up to21 kmon a dry dirt road. The use of a hybrid power plant on armored personnel carrier BTR-4MV1 improves its maneuverability when applying a power transmission scheme from a traction motor to each wheel separately, provides movement on traction batteries up to53 kmon a dry dirt road. The total power reserve will be no less than the base product, since the capacity of the fuel system did not decrease. The estimated maximum speed of an armored personnel carrier with a hybrid power plant corresponds to the maximum speed of the base product and is110 km/h.The introduction a hybrid power plant on military tracked vehicles weighing 40-50 tons is not advisable due to insufficient electric power, large overall dimensions a traction batteries and large mass of the product. A promising direction is the introduction a hybrid power plant on military wheeled vehicles weighing up to 30 tons. To implement a hybrid power plant on armored personnel carrier according to the scheme of transferring power from the traction electric motor to the wheel, it is necessary to develop a gearbox design with two gears.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it