Reducing moisture effects on soil organic carbon content prediction in visible and near-infrared spectra with an external parameter othogonalization algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Field spectroscopy and other efficient hyperspectral techniques have been widely used to measure soil properties, including soil organic carbon (SOC) content. However, reflectance measurements based on field spectroscopy are quite sensitive to uncontrolled variations in surface soil conditions, such as moisture content; hence, such variations lead to drastically reduced prediction accuracy. The goals of this work are to (i) explore the moisture effect on soil spectra with different SOC levels, (ii) evaluate the selection of optimal parameter for external parameter othogonalization (EPO) in reducing moisture effect, and (iii) improve SOC prediction accuracy for semi-arid soils with various moisture levels by combing the EPO with machine learning method. Soil samples were collected from grassland regions of Inner Mongolia in North China. Rewetting laboratory experiments were conducted to make samples moisturized at five levels. Visible and near-infrared spectra (350–2500 nm) of soil samples rewetted were observed using a hand-held SVC HR-1024 spectroradiometer. Our results show that moisture influences the correlation between SOC content and soil reflectance spectra and that moisture has a greater impact on the spectra of samples with low SOC. An EPO algorithm can quantitatively extract information of the affected spectra from the spectra of moist soil samples by an optimal singular value. A SOC model that effectively couples EPO with random forest (RF) outperforms partial least-square regression (PLSR)-based models. The EPO–RF model generates better results with R2 of 0.86 and root-mean squared error (RMSE) of 3.82 g kg−1, whereas a PLSR model gives R2 of 0.79 and RMSE of 4.68 g kg−1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".