Functional connectome contractions in temporal lobe epilepsy: Microstructural underpinnings and predictors of surgical outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common drug-resistant epilepsy in adults. Although it is commonly related to hippocampal pathology, increasing evidence suggests structural changes beyond the mesiotemporal lobe. Functional anomalies and their link to underlying structural alterations, however, remain incompletely understood. METHODS: We studied 30 drug-resistant TLE patients and 57 healthy controls using multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analyses. All patients had histologically verified hippocampal sclerosis and underwent postoperative imaging to outline the extent of their surgical resection. Our analysis leveraged a novel resting-state functional MRI framework that parameterizes functional connectivity distance, consolidating topological and physical properties of macroscale brain networks. Functional findings were integrated with morphological and microstructural metrics, and utility for surgical outcome prediction was assessed using machine learning techniques. RESULTS: Compared to controls, TLE patients showed connectivity distance reductions in temporoinsular and prefrontal networks, indicating topological segregation of functional networks. Testing for morphological and microstructural associations, we observed that functional connectivity contractions occurred independently from TLE-related cortical atrophy but were mediated by microstructural changes in the underlying white matter. Following our imaging study, all patients underwent an anterior temporal lobectomy as a treatment of their seizures, and postsurgical seizure outcome was determined at a follow-up at least 1 year after surgery. Using a regularized supervised machine learning paradigm with fivefold cross-validation, we demonstrated that patient-specific functional anomalies predicted postsurgical seizure outcome with 76 ± 4% accuracy, outperforming classifiers operating on clinical and structural imaging features. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest connectivity distance contractions as a macroscale substrate of TLE. Functional topological isolation may represent a microstructurally mediated network mechanism that tilts the balance toward epileptogenesis in affected networks and that may assist in patient-specific surgical prognostication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".