The last gasp of the Rogaland Igneous Complex, Norway: a palaeopole for the 920 Ma Tellnes intrusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The Rogaland Igneous Complex (RIC) in southern Norway intruded into Sveconorwegian granulite crust beginning ∼930 Ma. Three massif anorthosite bodies, Egersund–Ogna, Helleren and Åna-Sira, were intruded some 10 Myr later by the Bjerkreim–Sokndal layered intrusion. The Garsaknatt leuconorite and the ilmenite-rich Tellnes norite, one of the youngest rock in the complex at ∼920 Ma, intrude the anorthosite or nearby country rock. Magnetic mineralogy and palaeomagnetic studies carried out on the Tellnes norite, the Garsaknatt leuconorite and the surrounding Åna-Sira anorthosite, indicate the magnetization of all three bodies are dominated by hemo-ilmenite carrying the remanence as a thermochemical remanent magnetization, although magnetite is present in some samples. The three bodies yield steep negative inclinations with northwesterly declinations (Tellnes, I = −71.9°, D = 305.0°, α95 = 10.6°; Garsaknatt, I = −73.1°, D = 312.7°, α95 = 4.7°; and Åna-Sira, I = −81.2°, D = 326.3°, α95 = 6.7°). When combined with data from other bodies in the RIC, the older anorthosites have steeper inclinations, and higher palaeolatitudes, while the younger units have less steep inclinations and shallower palaeolatitudes by nearly 10°, indicating northward plate motion during cooling of the intrusions. Age of the remanence is difficult to determine precisely, however, best estimates are ∼910 Ma for the older anorthosites and ∼900 Ma for the younger intrusions. Although these differences are significant, a unified pole position (35.6° N, 215.1° E), combining all the 111 sites from the RIC, strongly supports the assumed position of southern Baltica in Rodinia at ∼900 MA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".