MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031570094 · doi:10.33633/joins.v5i1.3469

Analisis Persebaran UMKM Kota Malang Menggunakan Cluster K-means

2020· article· id· W3031570094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJOINS (Journal of Information System) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsCluster (spacecraft)Computer scienceArtOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UMKM (Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah) merupakan usaha produktif yang telah terbukti memberikan lapangan kerja dan menjadi penggerak roda perekonomian di Indonesia. Kota Malang dianggap memiliki potensi besar di sektor UMKM. Di sisi lain, UMKM juga menghadapi berbagai masalah, seperti keterbatasan modal kerja, kurangnya pembinaan terhadap sumber daya manusia, dan lain sebagainya. Pengelompokan UMKM di Kota Malang dapat memudahkan pemerintah terkait dalam hal memilih peminjaman modal, menentukan potensi usaha dan menetapkan strategi pemasaran. Pada penelitian ini, pengelompokan UMKM di Kota Malang dilakukan dengan algoritma K-means cluster analysis. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah terbentuk 3 cluster, di mana algoritma K-means mengelompokkan kecamatan Blimbing ke cluster 1, kecamatan Klojen ke cluster 2, kecamatan Sukun ke cluster 3, Kecamatan Kedung Kandang ke cluster 3, dan Kecamatan Lowokwaru ke cluster 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it