Multiamorphous Phases in Diketopyrrolopyrrole-Based Conjugated Polymers: From Bulk to Ultrathin Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The glass transition temperature ( T g ) of conjugated polymers is a crucial physical parameter that governs their mechanical and electrical properties for applications from sensor technology to skin-like electronics. Despite some well-developed methods that exist for detecting T g of conjugated polymers, there is still a need for the combination of advanced calorimetric methodologies to characterize T g in a broad range of temperatures and scales from bulk to nanometer-thin films. In this work, alternating current (ac) chip calorimetry and flash differential scanning calorimetry (flash DSC) are applied to successfully identify the T g s and segmental relaxations of conjugated polymers. The detected relaxations were interpreted, in agreement with existing observations in similar systems, as a side-chain relaxation (low temperature), mobile amorphous fractions (MAF), and rigid amorphous fractions (RAF). T g s of MAF and RAF increase and decrease with increasing size of fused thiophene units in the backbone, respectively. The T g s of diketopyrrolopyrrole-based conjugated polymer thin films are also identified by the same method, with both T g s showing a decreased value compared to those of bulk samples. Furthermore, the weight fractions of MAF and RAF with various film thicknesses are qualitatively analyzed based on the heat capacity step of each amorphous fraction during the glass transition. This facile method gives insights into the physical nature of amorphous phases in conjugated polymers for better revealing their structure–property relationships, which will guide the designs of new materials with optimized electrical and mechanical properties in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".