MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031641574 · doi:10.48336/6kdn-1x13

Surviving to thriving: post-secondary education for refugee youth in smaller centres in Canada

2020· dissertation· en· W3031641574 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hua Que

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRefugeeThrivingPolitical sciencePedagogyQualitative researchMedical educationPsychologySociologyMedicineSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research investigates refugee youth’s aspirations for and access to post-secondary education in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The theoretical framework that underpins this study consists of segmented assimilation theory and the bioecological model of human development. A basic qualitative research approach was employed. Twenty refugee youths and three staff members from educational service providers participated in this study. Data were collected through one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Findings revealed that new life in Canada instilled hope into refugee youth as they aspired to get into university after high school. Refugee youth referred to their parents, support teachers and staff in high school, their friends, and university academic advisors as important people who helped them realize their educational goals. In addition, three educational programs were identified by refugee youth as helpful in preparing them for post-secondary education. Nonetheless, refugee youth’s access to post-secondary education was impeded by a number of barriers, including financial difficulties resulting from the repayment of transportation loans and a lack of target scholarships for refugee students pursuing post-secondary education, lack of information about post-secondary admission requirements, scholarships, and on-campus employment opportunities, negative peer influence from refugee students who were less motivated, limited communication with local peers, and fear of the unknown and the academic challenges they would face in post-secondary education. In addition, refugee youth aged 19 or over found it difficult to further their education due to the policy of high school age limits and a lack of appropriate adult educational programs geared to their needs. Recommendations were also offered to reduce these barriers such as eliminating transportation loans and offering targeted scholarships and bursaries to refugee youth; providing refugee youth with information and assistance they need to make informed decisions about their education and career; increasing the number of ESL teachers at the secondary level and continuing to offer ESL support for college and university refugee students; and optimizing language and academic support for refugee young adults with goals of pursuing post-secondary education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesFrench-language works237,207