MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031674256 · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2020.164807

The GlueX beamline and detector

2020· article· en· W3031674256 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Adhikari, C. S. Akondi, H. Al Ghoul, A. B. M. Shawkat Ali, M. J. Amaryan, E.G. Anassontzis, A. Austregesilo, Fernando Barbosa, J. Barlow, A. V. Barnes, E. Barriga, R. Barsotti, T. D. Beattie, J. Benesch, В. В. Бердников, G. Biallas, T. Black, W. Boeglin, P. Brindza, W. J. Briscoe, T. Britton, J. Brock, W. K. Brooks, B. E. Cannon, C. Carlin, D. S. Carman, T. Carstens, N. Cao, Oleksandr Chernyshov, E. Chudakov, S. Cole, O. Cortes, W.D. Crahen, V. Credé, M. M. Dalton, T. Daniels, A. Deur, C. Dickover, S. Dobbs, A. Dolgolenko, R. Dotel, M. Dugger, R. Dzhygadlo, A. Dzierba, H. Egiyan, T. Erbora, A. Ernst, P. Eugenio, C. Fanelli, S. Fegan, A. M. Foda, J. H. Foote, J. Frye, S. Furletov, L. Gan, A. Gasparian, А. С. Герасимов, N. Gevorgyan, C. Gleason, K. Goetzen, A. Gonçalves, V. Goryachev, L. Guo, H. Hakobyan, A. Hamdi, John Hardin, C.L. Henschel, G. M. Huber, Charles Hutton, A. Hurley, P. Ioannou, D. G. Ireland, M. M. Ito, N. S. Jarvis, R. T. Jones, V. Kakoyan, S. Katsaganis, G. Kalicy, M. Kamel, C. Keith, F. J. Klein, R. Kliemt, D. Kolybaba, C. Kourkoumelis, S.T. Krueger, S. Kuleshov, I. Larin, David Lawrence, J. Leckey, Daniel Lersch, B. Leverington, W. I. Levine, W. Li, B. Liu, K. Livingston, G. J. Lolos, Valery E. Lyubovitskij, D. Mack, H. Marukyan, P. Mattione, V. Matveev, M. McCaughan, M. McCracken, W. McGinley, Justin I. McIntyre, D. Meekins, R. A. Méndez, C. A. Meyer, R. Miskimen, R. E. Mitchell, F. Mokaya, K. Moriya, F. Nerling, L. Ng, H. Ni, A. Ostrovidov, Z. Papandreou, M. Patsyuk, C. Paudel, P. Pauli, R. Pedroni, L. Pentchev, Κ. Peters, W. Phelps, J. Pierce, E. Pooser, V. Popov, B. Pratt, Y. Qiang, N. Qin, V. Razmyslovich, J. Reinhold, B. G. Ritchie, J. Ritman, Lee Robison, D. Romanov, C. Romero, C. Salgado, N. Sandoval, T. Satogata, A. M. Schertz, S. Schadmand, A. Schick, R. A. Schumacher, C. Schwarz, J. Schwiening, A. Yu. Semenov, I. A. Semenova, K. K. Seth, X. Y. Shen, M. R. Shepherd, E. S. Smith, D. I. Sober, A. Somov, S. Somov, Orlando Javier Soto Sandoval, N. A. Sparks, Michael Staib, C. Stanislav, J. R. Stevens, J. Stewart, I. I. Strakovsky, B. Sumner, K. Suresh, В. В. Тарасов, S. Taylor, L.A. Teigrob, A. Teymurazyan, A. Thiel, I. Tolstukhin, A. Tomaradze, A. Toro, Aristeidis Tsaris, Y. Van Haarlem, G. Vasileiadis, Inés de Vega, G. Visser, G. Voulgaris, N. K. Walford, D. Werthmüller, T. Whitlatch, N. Wickramaarachchi, M. Williams, E. Wolin, Ting Xiao, Yunjie Yang, J. Zarling, Zhuoran Zhang, Q. Zhou, X. Zhou, B. Zihlmann

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Regina
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGSI Helmholtzzentrum für SchwerionenforschungChina Scholarship CouncilForschungszentrum JülichNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBeamlineDetectorPhysicsNuclear physicsOpticsBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2510.164

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated EquipmentSame topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207