Bibliographic record
Abstract
At present, scar is one of the key areas of medical research, and its evaluation, prevention, and control methods have received more and more attention. Scar is generally divided into superficial scar, atrophic scar, hypertrophic scar, and keloid. The mechanism is thought to involve abnormal proliferation of fibroblasts and imbalance of secretion, synthesis, and degradation of collagen caused by various factors during the skin wound healing process, which eventually result in the formation of abnormal hypertrophic skin tissue. The severity of scar is measured mainly using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS), the Patient and Observer scar Assessment scale (POSAS) and so on. Its main treatments include pressure therapy, silicone gel therapy, radiation therapy, laser therapy, intralesional corticosteroids, and surgical therapy. Now it is believed that combination therapy is still the safe and effective strategy for the prevention and control of scar. Key words: Scar; Hyperplastic; Keloid; Surgery; Combined therapy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".