The complete mitochondrial genome of sugarcane ( <i>Saccharum</i> spp.) variety FN15
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complete mitogenome of Saccharum spp. hybrid FN15 was successfully sequenced. It contains two distinct circular chromosomes, Chromosome 1 and Chromosome 2. The former is 301,533 bp in length with the GC content of 43.90%, and 7.12% of genome (21,468 nucleotides) are coding DNA while 92.88% of genome (280,065 nucleotides) are intergenic region. The latter is 144,744 bp in length with the GC content of 43.57%, and 8.20% of genome (11,865 nucleotides) are coding DNA and 91.80% of genome (132,879 nucleotides) are intergenic region. Besides, Chromosome 1 contains 22 protein-coding genes (four atp genes, three ccm genes, three cox genes, one mat gene, one mtt gene, six nad genes and four rps genes), and 21 non-coding genes (15 tRNA and six rRNAs), whereas in Chromosome 2, there are 13 protein-coding genes (two atp genes, one ccm gene, one cob gene, one cox gene, one rpl gene, four nad genes and three rps genes) and five tRNA genes. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that FN15 is close with S. spp. hybrid ROC22, S. officinarum Khon Kaen 3 and S. bicolor species. This complete mitochondrial genome will provide essential DNA molecular data for further phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis for Saccharum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".