The origin and significance of convolute lamination and pseudonodules in an ancient deep-marine turbidite system: From deposition to diagenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Soft-sediment deformation structures, like convolute lamination and pseudonodules, are common in deep-marine turbidites, but details of their origin and timing of formation remain a source of debate. Deep-marine basin-floor deposits of the Neoproterozoic Upper Kaza Group (Windermere Supergroup) crop out superbly in the Castle Creek study area and provide an ideal laboratory to investigate these aspects in convolute-laminated pseudonodules, and also how that deformation influenced later diagenesis. Pseudonodules consist of well-sorted, matrix-poor, upper medium- to coarse-grained, planar-stratified or cross-stratified sandstone that are underlain and overlain by comparatively more poorly sorted, matrix-rich, graded sandstone of similar grain size. Deposition of the stratified pseudonodules is interpreted to have occurred during the same event that deposited the graded sandstone, albeit during a period of general transport bypass, whereby isolated, shallow, seafloor depressions became filled with well-sorted, stratified sand. As stratified sand accumulated the depressions slowly subsided until a critical thickness had built up and exceeded the load-bearing capacity of the substrate composed of graded sand. This destabilized the surface separating the two layers and resulted in the stratified unit foundering, and in some cases becoming completely enveloped by, the upward-displaced lower-density substrate. Surprisingly, despite the deformed macroscopic character of the stratified sediment, primary grain fabric, including intergranular porosity up to 40%, was preserved and influenced early diagenesis, which, owing to dispersed phosphate cement and depleted carbon isotope composition of the pervasive carbonate cement, would have begun very near the sediment–water interface. Importantly also, pseudonodules are common in basin-floor deposits but comparatively rare in continental-slope strata. Expanding flow conditions over the basin floor would have promoted grain settling, and in turn development of a more stably (density) stratified flow structure. Ultimately this resulted in higher local rates of sedimentation on the basin floor and the accumulation of a substrate more prone to later liquidization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".