MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031761817 · doi:10.1101/2020.05.29.124305

Structural basis for stereospecific inhibition of ASCT2 from rational design

2020· preprint· en· W3031761817 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel‐Ann A. Garibsingh, Elias Ndaru, Alisa A. Garaeva, Massimiliano Bonomi, Dirk Jan Slotboom, Cristina Paulino, Christof Grewer, Avner Schlessinger

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDruggabilityChemistryRational designAmino acidStereospecificityHomology modelingGlutamineTransporterBiochemistryBiophysicsEnzymeNanotechnologyBiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT ASCT2 (SLC1A5) is a sodium-dependent neutral amino acid transporter that controls amino acid homeostasis in peripheral tissues. ASCT2 is upregulated in cancer, where it modulates intracellular glutamine levels, fueling cell proliferation. Nutrient deprivation via ASCT2 inhibition provides an emerging strategy for cancer therapy. Here, guided by a homology model of ASCT2 in an outward-facing conformation, we rationally designed novel inhibitors exploiting stereospecific pockets in the substrate binding site. A cryo-EM structure of ASCT2 in complex with inhibitor ( Lc -BPE) validated our predictions and was subsequently refined based on computational analysis. The final structures, combined with MD simulations, show that the inhibitor samples multiple conformations in the ASCT2 binding site. Our results demonstrate the utility of combining computational modeling and cryo-EM for SLC ligand discovery, and a viable strategy for structure determination of druggable conformational states for challenging membrane protein targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207