Association between serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D status and peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the relationship between serum levels of 25(OH)D and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes by Meta analysis. Methods We searched the papers published before June 2016 from the database of PubMed, Cochrane,CNKI,VIP and Wanfang. Thirty one articles were found. Studies were screened and their quality were evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis were performed by RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 1 373 cases from 10 articles were involved. The results showed that the serum levels of 25(OH)D in type 2 diabetes with peripheral neuropathy was lower apparently than that of controls [WMD=-7.28, 95%CI (-9.21, -5.34) , P<0.000 01]. Conclusion There is an association between 25(OH)D and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes. Key words: Vitamin D; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Meta-analysis; Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.054 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".