FIGUR KEPEMIMPINAN MEMEDIASI PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN ADMINISTRASI TERHADAP KEPUASAN MASYARAKAT (Studi Masyarakat Yang Mencari Pelayanan di Kantor Desa Kabupaten Sragen)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is that this study aims to determine and analyze the influence of leadership figures mediating the influence of the quality of administrative services on community satisfaction in the Village Office in Sragen Regency. The location of this research is the Village Office in Sragen Regency. While the object of research is the community who use the administration service of the Village Office in Sragen Regency. The population in this study were all people who sought Village Office services in Sragen Regency in January 2020 as many as 1300 people. Researchers took 10% of the population as a sample, ie 130 people who use the services of the Village Office in Sragen Regency. The sampling technique uses convenience or accidental sampling, namely sampling that consists of individuals who are easily found and designed to see the character of the population easily. Hypothesis test results include the quality of administrative services and a significant positive effect on the leadership of the Village Office in Sragen Regency. The quality of administrative services has a positive and significant effect on community satisfaction in the Village Office in Sragen Regency. Leadership has a positive and significant effect on community satisfaction in the Village Office in Sragen Regency. Simultaneous test results (F test) can be concluded together that the independent variables have a significant effect on community satisfaction in the Village Office in Sragen Regency. The results of the total R2 value of 0.506 can be interpreted as variations in community satisfaction of the Village Office in Sragen Regency explained by the variable quality of administrative services, and leadership as an intervening variable of 50.6% and the remaining 49.4% explained by other variables outside the research model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".